DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Society & Work3 min read

Opinion: AI Thinking Game No. 496 explores past necessities and current AI roles

The 496th installment of the AI 1000‑Day Kaimine‑gyo challenge was posted by Entsu‑san: AI and Co‑Education Research Institute. The prompt asks participants to consider things that were once important but may no longer be needed, and to reflect on whether they truly became unnecessary.

1 source

Key points

  • AI Thinking Game No. 496 was posted by Entsu‑san: AI and Co‑Education Research Institute as part of the 1000‑Day Kaimine‑gyo challenge.
  • Gemini 3.5 rated the response 95/100; other models scored between 78 and 95 points.
  • The author notes using Claude Opus 5.5 and expects future model updates to change the game.

The author answers that such things are part of personal growth and asks the AI for an evaluation. Gemini 3.5 gave the response a score of 95 / 100, praising the nuanced view. Scores from other generative models were also listed: ChatGPT 94, Claude 82, Grok 88, Copilot 89, Perplexity 78, NotionAI 89.

The note mentions switching to Claude Opus 5.5 and anticipates future versions such as 6.0, suggesting the AI Thinking Game serves as a metacognition training tool that records how model interactions change over time.

Model page: Claude Opus 5.5 →

Full story from note.com · by たなかの · via Search: ChatGPTOpen source ↗

AI Thinking Game No. 496 Topic: 'Things that were important in the past but are no longer needed #496' ChatGPT

note.com · 23 September 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by note.com and written by たなかの. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page
Entsu-san: AI and Co-Education Research InstituteChatGPTGeminiClaude Opus 5.5GrokCopilotPerplexity

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Society & Work

All →

Related stories