UK watchdog bans AI ads that objectify women and enable non‑consensual explicit content
The UK Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) has prohibited five AI‑generated advertising campaigns on Meta’s platforms after finding they sexualised women and, in one case, used a girl under 18 in a sexual context. The ads promoted a range of AI tools – an Animcha companion app, the Nexaipic portrait generator, a video‑creation app labelled KH31 DD22, the Rusto AI image‑to‑video service and…
Key points
- ASA banned five AI‑generated content ads on Meta platforms for sexualising women and using under‑18 imagery.
- Ads promoted AI tools like Animcha’s companion, Nexaipic portrait generator, Rusto AI, PictoPop, and a video app KH31 DD22.
- ASA used its AI‑powered Active Ad Monitoring System; Meta previously removed over 344,000 similar nudifying ads.
ASA said the content breached both its own rules and recent UK legislation that bans non‑consensual deep‑fake nude imagery. The regulator identified the ads using its AI‑powered Active Ad Monitoring System, highlighting a growing reliance on automated tools to police online advertising. Meta had already removed the offending material, but the ASA’s action underscores a “zero‑tolerance” stance and the potential for law‑enforcement referrals when illegal content is detected.
The decision follows a broader crackdown on nudifying apps after earlier scandals involving X’s chatbot and a flood of similar ads on Meta, where over 344,000 related promotions were removed between November 2025 and January 2026.
AI app ads promoting 'objectification of women' banned by watchdog
BBC Technology · 15 September 2026
A series of social media adverts for AI apps have been banned by a UK watchdog for promoting "the creation of sexually explicit content and objectification of women".
The Advertising Standards Authority (ASA) said five ads uploaded to Meta platforms for AI companion and video generating apps had objectified and sexualised women, including through harmful gender stereotypes.
One of the ads used sexualised images of a girl under 18 to promote an AI companion app - while others invited users to upload images of their "crush" and turn images into "sizzling" videos.
Meta had already removed the offending ads. But Nicky Baker of the ASA said such content had the potential "to cause real-world harm".
"We take a firm line on ads that are likely to cause serious or widespread offence and these ads are a clear example of why that matters," she said.
"Encouraging and condoning the objectification of women and the creation of explicit content from people's images has the potential to cause real-world harm."
The ASA also said many of the ads it banned had promoted the creation of sexually explicit content using real women's images without their consent.
It comes only months after the UK outlawed apps to create non-consensual deepfake nude imagery - sparked by outrage over X's chatbot Grok complying with requests to nudify images of women on the platform.
The ASA said the law had changed during its investigations and that ads identified in future would be considered in light of both the law and its own rules.
Where ads are identified as illegal, it said it may notify platforms and law enforcement.
'Zero tolerance'
The ads were identified by the regulator using its AI-powered "Active Ad Monitoring System", which proactively searches for ads which might violate UK rules.
It said the five ads it were banned had depicted women irresponsibly, and were likely to cause serious or widespread offence.
One ad for an AI companion generator, developed by Animcha Ltd, was also found to have portrayed someone under 18 in a sexual way, the ASA said.
It presented the synthetic female character as someone users could "customise" and instruct, combining sexualised imagery with childlike clothing and objects.
Two ads for an AI portrait generation tool called Nexaipic encouraged users to "upload your crush and let AI create what you imagine" with sexually explicit videos.
An ad for an AI image-to-video generation app, identified only as KH31 DD22, depicted a clothed woman being transformed into a video in which she was topless.
The watchdog said this suggested the app could be used to create content that exposed women's bodies.
Further adverts for image generation tool Rusto AI, which encouraged users to create sexualised videos from photographs, were found to have condoned the digital manipulation of women's images to create sexually explicit content.
And an ad for an AI image-to-video generation app PictoPop used sexualised imagery to demonstrate the tool, including by portraying the woman in a submissive position.
The ASA said none of the apps' creators responded to its enquiries.
Baker said the watchdog had taken "proactive action" with its rulings, as part of a wider "zero-tolerance approach" to such adverts.
And while Meta had removed the ads for breaching its own rules prior to the ASA's action, the social media giant has faced prior scrutiny over similar ads appearing on its platforms.
Researcher Alexios Mantzarlis reported in early September that an investigation, external had found 11,336 ads on Meta's platforms claiming they could be used to turn images of clothed people into sexually explicit videos.
Most of these ads were removed automatically by Meta, however Mantzarlis said many ads it identified had promoted domains or publishers that his site, Indicator, had previously flagged to the tech giant.
Meta declined to comment, but pointed to action it has already taken to tackle nudification apps, external, including using new tech to detect ads and taking legal action.
The firm has also previously revealed, external that between November 2025 and January 2026, it removed over 344,000 ads for nudifying apps across Facebook and Instagram.
This text was published by BBC Technology and written by https://www.facebook.com/bbcnews. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.
More in Policy & Regulation
All →- Australia Considers Copyright Exemptions for AI Training Amid Push for US Tech Deals · 1 src
- Nvidia CEO calls AI innovation vs safety debate a false choice · 3 src
- Sanders warns Congress is asleep on AI risks at Washington event · 3 src
- Anthropic CEO urges government oversight as company eyes IPO · 25 src
- Critics label Big AI's proposed development slowdown a market lockout strategy · 7 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions