DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Society & Work3 min read

AI firms claim they can recreate endangered plant scents without harvesting

Scientists and biotech companies say AI could soon replicate scents from endangered plants, reducing pressure on wild populations. Osmo, a Google Brain spin-off, used AI to recreate a rare tree’s scent from a tiny bark sample. BioHarvest Sciences created a cell culture for an unnamed Southeast Asian plant, aiming for 20 tonnes of fragrance production next year, according to its CEO, Zaki Rakib.…

1 source

Key points

  • Osmo’s AI recreated a rare tree scent from a finger-sized bark sample using spectrometry and AI reconstruction
  • BioHarvest plans 20 tonnes of fragrance production from a cell culture of an unnamed endangered plant by 2027
  • Critics argue synthetic scents don’t protect endangered species or reduce wild harvesting pressure

Critics like Mandy Aftel, founder of the Aftel Archive, argue that replicating a scent doesn’t save the plant. Rhian Smith of Kew Gardens notes that wild-sourced oudh remains highly prized. Osmo’s founder, Alex Wiltschko, admits conservation isn’t his primary focus, but his AI predicts scent combinations using over 5 million human responses. Other projects, like Cloud Reverie, harvest microbes from clouds for new fragrances. Still, experts say AI can’t fully capture a plant’s complex scent—it’s just a fragment of the original.

Full story from The Guardian AI · by Amelia HillOpen source ↗

Remaking scents: could fragrance tech help take pressure off endangered plants?

The Guardian AI · 6 October 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by The Guardian AI and written by Amelia Hill. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page
OsmoBioHarvest SciencesGoogle BrainFuture SocietyAlex WiltschkoZaki RakibMandy AftelRhian SmithChristina Agapakis

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Society & Work

All →

Related stories