DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Policy & Regulation4 min read

Anthropic and OpenAI have funneled $100 million into super PACs for 2024 midterms

Anthropic and OpenAI have directed $100 million into political action committees since last year, with nearly $60 million already spent on races across the United States. The money is flowing through super PACs that can raise and spend unlimited amounts, allowing the firms to back both Republican and Democratic candidates.

1 source

Key points

  • Anthropic and OpenAI have funneled $100 million into super PACs since last year, spending nearly $60 million on races.
  • OpenAI‑backed American Mission spent nearly $2.3 million for Sen. Darline Graham; Anthropic‑backed PAC spent $1.5 million for Rep. Carlos De La Cruz.
  • The Campaign Legal Center complained the OpenAI‑backed PACs used shell companies to evade federal reporting requirements.

OpenAI‑backed American Mission poured almost $2.3 million into the campaign of South Carolina Sen. Darline Graham, while an Anthropic‑linked PAC spent $1.5 million for Rep. Carlos De La Cruz in Texas. Anthropic‑connected Jobs and Democracy PAC spent over $1.6 million for Dem Rep. Valerie Foushee in North Carolina. The firms have also spent against each other, totaling $27 million in the New York congressional race of Alex Bores. The Campaign Legal Center filed a complaint alleging OpenAI‑backed PACs used shell companies to evade federal reporting requirements.

Sarah Bryner of Public Agenda says the AI companies are “building their slate of allies in Congress” as public opinion remains cautious, with 64 % of Americans believing AI is developing too quickly.

The story so far

5 episodes →
  1. Anthropic and OpenAI have funneled $100 million into super PACs for 2024 midtermsthis story
Full story from csmonitor.com · by The Christian Science Monitor · via Search: OpenAIOpen source ↗

The AI industry’s race for influence includes $100 million in campaign cash

csmonitor.com · 19 October 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by csmonitor.com and written by The Christian Science Monitor. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page
AnthropicOpenAIPublic AgendaCampaign Legal CenterMonitorSarah BrynerAaron GlantzDarline GrahamCarlos De La CruzValerie Foushee

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Policy & Regulation

All →

Related stories