ArXiv versus AI slop: will capping preprint submissions work?

Reactions to the policy are mixed. Siddhesh Zādéy, an epidemiologist at Columbia University, argued that the cap does not hinder productivity, as producing two preprints monthly is already substantial work. However, Victor Galitski, a physicist at the University of Maryland, noted that the rule can be bypassed by co-authors taking turns to submit. Philip Cohen, director of the social-sciences repository SocArXiv, which limits submissions to one per week, suggested that rapid successive uploads are often a sign of AI-generated "slop." Natalie Khalil, founder of Reviewer3, warned that rejecting these papers may simply shift the problem to other platforms rather than solving the underlying issue of AI-generated content flooding academic repositories.