DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Generative AI & Models3 min read

Could this be a Deep Blue moment for the cryptic crossword?

Darmok, a new AI system, solved the final puzzle of the Times’ annual cryptic crossword about three minutes faster than Liam Hughes, the contest’s youngest human champion. The Times final was completed in roughly three minutes, beating the human time.

1 source

Key points

  • Darmok solved the Times cryptic crossword final puzzle faster than human winner Liam Hughes by about three minutes.
  • The model uses Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Fable 5, GPT‑5 and GPT‑6 Astra, with Gemini and Claude doing most of the solving.
  • Dr Sid Chatterjee led Darmok’s development, following earlier successes of WebCrow and Dr Fill in crossword competitions.

The model is built on four frontier language models: Gemini 3.1 Pro, Claude Fable 5, GPT‑5 and GPT‑6 Astra. Gemini and Claude do most of the solving, while the other models provide support when needed. Dr Sid Chatterjee, a computer scientist at the University of Texas, led the project, following earlier successes of WebCrow and Dr Fill in crossword competitions.

The achievement shows AI can handle complex wordplay and visual clues, suggesting broader advances in natural language understanding and potential applications in education, puzzle design and complex problem solving.

Model page: GPT-6 Astra →

Full story from The Guardian AI · by Alan EvansOpen source ↗

Could this be a Deep Blue moment for the cryptic crossword?

The Guardian AI · 20 October 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by The Guardian AI and written by Alan Evans. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page
GoogleAnthropicOpenAITimesNew York TimesIBMDarmokGemini 3.1 ProClaude Fable 5GPT-5GPT-6 AstraDr Sid ChatterjeeLiam HughesMark GoodliffeWill Shortz

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Generative AI & Models

All →

Related stories