DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research

IneqAgent uses LLMs and symbolic math to prove inequalities in Lean4

Researchers have introduced IneqAgent, a new agentic framework designed for formal inequality proving in the Lean4 theorem prover. The system combines large language model (LLM) reasoning with symbolic computation to handle mathematical tasks that require exact computation and intermediate lemmas. A key component is Lemma-level Monte Carlo Tree Search, which coordinates the construction of…

1 source primary source

Key points

  • IneqAgent combines LLM reasoning with symbolic computation for inequality proving in Lean4.
  • Using DeepSeek-V4-Flash, the agent solved 175 of 186 benchmark problems (94.09%).
  • The system achieved Lean-verified strengthenings of Dittert's conjecture in dimensions four and five.

The framework utilizes complementary backends, including sum-of-squares, Bernstein, and successive difference-substitution, to generate exact certificates for local Lean proofs. These are integrated with LLM-generated steps, and the agent uses Lean feedback to construct complete proofs that are checked against original theorem statements. This approach aims to bridge the gap between heuristic LLM reasoning and rigorous formal verification.

In testing on four benchmarks, IneqAgent paired with the DeepSeek-V4-Flash model solved 175 of 186 problems, achieving a 94.09% success rate. This represents the highest overall success rate among the evaluated methods. The study also notes that IneqAgent achieves higher success rates at low LLM inference cost thresholds compared to a Direct Agent using the same backbone. Additionally, the system produced Lean-verified strengthenings of Dittert's conjecture in dimensions four and five and certified the Holens--Djokovic (4,4) inequality.

Read the original at arXiv cs.AI · by Gaolei He, Jinhui Li, Ruobing Zuo, Xia Zeng, Zhengfeng Yang primary sourceOpen source ↗
Topics · follow one to build your own front page

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories