Microsoft and CMU host workshop on AI agent evaluation measurement science
Microsoft Research and Carnegie Mellon University's AI Measurement Science & Engineering Center (AIMSEC) will hold a two‑day workshop in New York on October 22‑23, 2026. The event aims to bring together more than 150 stakeholders from academia, industry, civil society and government to discuss a common "measurement science" for evaluating and governing AI agents.
Key points
- Microsoft Research and CMU AIMSEC host a two‑day workshop on Oct 22‑23, 2026 in New York.
- Over 150 stakeholders will discuss horizontal and vertical evaluation dimensions for AI agents.
- Public documentation of consensus, disagreements and open issues will be released after the meeting.
The agenda separates evaluation into "horizontal" challenges that apply across agents and "vertical" use‑case‑specific criteria such as healthcare, software development and security. Breakout sessions will address long‑running tasks, multi‑agent collaboration, safety, red‑team testing, and how humans can intervene, understand, and recover from failures. Microsoft Research says the meeting will culminate in public documentation that records unresolved issues, points of consensus and gaps in current methods.
The discussion emphasizes that a single success‑rate score is insufficient; instead, the process, human burden, and controllability must be measured. Ultimately, humans will set the passing line for each application, using the evaluation results as material for responsible decision‑making.
What Score Makes an AI Agent Pass? The "Measurement Science" Advanced by Microsoft and CMU
note.com · 24 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by note.com and written by つるとーのひとりごと. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Policy & Regulation
All →- WA government seeks cost recovery from Deloitte over flawed university merger report · 1 src
- Veterans group rates AI-119 Vulcan Project top at 93.7 in cybersecurity analysis · 1 src
- DeepSeek and MiniMax clear China's AI export registration · 3 src
- US bans DeepSeek from civilian government systems · 1 src
- Lawmakers say AI leaders are a political liability, Axios reports · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions