DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research

Researchers link AI agent power to human Goal attainment in formal models

A new paper on arXiv explores how power dynamics between AI agents and humans can be quantified in socio-technical systems. The authors propose two measures: information-theoretic empowerment—how much an agent’s actions influence future states—and capability-based individual power, which gauges a human’s ability to achieve goals based on probabilistic outcomes. They derive a mathematical…

1 source primary source

Key points

  • Two formal measures of AI-agent power defined: empowerment (action influence) and capability-based individual power (goal attainment)
  • Goal revelation bounded by empowerment (upper limit) and a satisfaction floor (*B(s)*) derived from Fano’s inequality
  • Failure modes identified: empowerment-maximizing agents may ignore goal relevance; revelation-maximizing agents may mislabel goals

The work highlights critical failure modes: an AI maximizing empowerment might prioritize broad influence over irrelevant actions, while one maximizing revelation could mislabel goals without improving outcomes. The authors argue that only satisfaction floors—calculated from interaction logs—can reliably monitor human power retention. Simulations suggest the three metrics (empowerment, revelation, and satisfaction) correlate but are not interchangeable.

Read the original at arXiv cs.AI · by Jaime Ruiz-Serra, Tom\'a\v{s} Gaven\v{c}iak, Jobst Heitzig primary sourceOpen source ↗

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories