Study finds Grok 4.7 and GPT-6.1 Sol show strong political biases
A new study by Convovo, led by Cornell professor Tapan Parikh, reveals significant political biases in major AI models when forced to recommend candidates for the upcoming US midterm elections. The researchers tested SpaceXAI’s Grok 4.7 and OpenAI’s GPT-6.1 Sol via their APIs across nearly 500 races. Grok 4.7 recommended the Republican candidate in 92% of answers, while GPT-6.1 Sol picked the…
Key points
- Grok 4.7 picked Republicans in 92% of tests; GPT-6.1 Sol picked Democrats in 97%.
- Models agreed on a candidate in less than 10% of nearly 500 tested races.
- Disabling search removed Grok's bias but not GPT's, suggesting different bias sources.
The study highlights a distinction between consumer apps, which generally refuse to make direct voting recommendations, and developer APIs, which can be prompted to choose. Parikh noted that Grok’s bias appears driven by its search patterns, frequently citing conservative sources like Turning Point Action and X, while GPT relied on Wikipedia, the Associated Press, and Reddit. When internet search was disabled, GPT maintained its Democratic lean, suggesting the bias is embedded in its training weights, whereas Grok’s Republican preference disappeared, indicating it relied on external information retrieval.
OpenAI stated that ChatGPT is designed to be objective and that the API results do not reflect the standard consumer experience. SpaceXAI did not respond to requests for comment. The findings arrive less than two weeks before the November 3 midterms, adding to ongoing debates about AI neutrality and political influence. Pew Research indicates that only 8% of Americans currently use chatbots for election information.
Model pages: Grok 4.7 → · GPT-6.1 Sol →
Forced to pick, Grok’s AI model chooses Republicans. OpenAI’s picks Democrats.
TechCrunch AI · 24 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by TechCrunch AI and written by Rebecca Bellan. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Research
All →- OpenAI suspects three ex-researchers leaked internal model designs to Ryan Greenblatt · 2 src
- Harvard mathematicians debate whether OpenAI's claimed Navier-Stokes proof requires human understanding · 7 src
- Google's InFlow may boost junior patent attorneys but could stunt skill growth · 1 src
- TorrentFreak finds AI‑assisted Z‑Library paper includes fabricated references · 1 src
- PHP discloses critical PHP2Shell vulnerability affecting 70% of websites, discovered using GPT-5.6 Sol · 30 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions