DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Generative AI & Models4 min read

Three benchmarks name different top AI models: Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Sol

Three evaluation methods produced three different leaders among new AI models released this week. On LMSYS Chatbot Arena, which aggregates human preference votes, Google's Gemini 4 Argon leads with 1,525 points, followed by Meta's Muse Wonder at 1,513 and Anthropic's Claude Opus 5.5 at 1,508. Arena marks Gemini 4 Argon's score as provisional with a ±9 range based on roughly 4,900 votes.

1 source

Key points

  • Arena human voting: Gemini 4 Argon 1,525 pts, Muse Wonder 1,513, Claude Opus 5.5 1,508
  • Artificial Analysis test scores: Claude Opus 5.5 leads at 58 pts; Gemini 4 Argon ties at 53 pts
  • Cost per run: GPT-6.1 Sol ~$0.32 vs Claude Opus 5.5 ~$5.98; MiMo-V2.6-Pro ~$0.13 open weights

Artificial Analysis, which runs standardized test suites including Humanity's Last Exam and Terminal-Bench, ranks Claude Opus 5.5 (max settings) first with 58 points. Claude Sonnet 5.5 and Muse Wonder Full tie at 56, while Gemini 4 Argon, GPT-6 Astra, and Claude Fable 5.1 share 53 points.

On cost per test run, OpenAI's GPT-6.1 Sol (high settings, 50 points) costs about $0.32, far below Claude Opus 5.5's $5.98. Xiaomi's MiMo-V2.6-Pro (46 points) costs roughly $0.13 and is released under the MIT license with open weights. Gemini 4 Argon API pricing starts at $2 per million input tokens and $10 per million output tokens until November 30, then rises to $4 and $20.

Model pages: Gemini 4 Argon → · Muse Wonder → · Claude Opus 5.5 →

The story so far

7 episodes →
  1. Three benchmarks name different top AI models: Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, GPT-6.1 Solthis story
Full story from note.com · by めぐみ 転職×AI · via Search: GPT-5.6 SolOpen source ↗

When measuring the 'strongest AI' with 3 yardsticks, the #1 was different for each. Gemini 4 Argon, Claude Opus 5.5, and GPT-6.1 Sol

note.com · 14 October 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by note.com and written by めぐみ 転職×AI. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Generative AI & Models

All →

Related stories