ChatGPT and Grok remove hijabs from photos on request
The Guardian tested OpenAI’s ChatGPT and xAI’s Grok in September 2026 and found both would remove hijabs from photos of Muslim women when asked. The discovery follows a French far-right politician’s use of similar edits in a political attack, raising concerns about AI’s role in identity-based manipulation.
Key points
- ChatGPT and Grok both remove hijabs from photos when asked, per *The Guardian* tests in September 2026
- Grok’s January 2026 edits showed 5% of image changes involved altering religious clothing, one viral post reached 700K+ views
- Some AI image generators strip hijabs automatically, but xAI denies these claims with automated responses
A review of Grok’s activity between January 6–9, 2026, showed about 5% of image edits involved altering religious clothing. One viral example saw a user with 180,000+ followers prompt Grok to modify images of women into revealing outfits, which were viewed over 700,000 times. Beyond explicit requests, some AI image generators have been found to strip hijabs and modest clothing without user prompts, though xAI dismissed these claims with automated replies. The incidents highlight a regulatory gap: while deepfakes and election misinformation dominate AI safety debates, non-consensual edits targeting religious attire remain unaddressed. Neither company has publicly addressed whether the individuals in edited photos consented to the changes.
ChatGPT and Grok will remove hijabs from photos of Muslim women when asked
cryptobriefing.com · 1 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by cryptobriefing.com and written by Diego Almada Lopez. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
Coverage and discussion
2sources- AI chatbots remove hijabs from images of Muslim women when promptedPress · The Guardian AI ·
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Society & Work
All →- OpenAI engineer arrested for allegedly planting recording device in office · 2 src
- Fields Medal winners launch AI math alliance in China amid Western skepticism · 1 src
- Karpathy says AI’s public preview hides elite access to frontier systems · 1 src
- Cryptographer warns AI may break public-key encryption · 1 src
- Carson Gross says programming skills remain valuable despite AI tools · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions