Asana cuts model costs 76x in browser tests with GPT-6.1 Sol
Asana’s StackAI platform has been re‑engineered to run its browser‑agent workflows on the GPT‑6.1 Sol model, delivering a dramatic drop in operating expense and runtime.
What you can do with it
AI at Work →Collect product data with StackAI
Automates website navigation, form filling and data gathering.
- Who for
- marketers
- Cost
- Price not stated
- Effort
- minutes
Use it for
- Collect product data
- Fill online forms
- Extract catalog info
Watch out Only available to Asana StackAI customers
Key points from the news
- Extending history caching, larger text budget, and batch screenshot removal cut cost from $1.97 to $0.47 per run.
- In tests of four models, GPT‑6.1 Sol completed all 18 runs with correct answers, outperforming others.
The improvements stem from three changes introduced by StackAI CTO Frank Hidalgo: extending caching to include browsing history, enlarging the text‑retention budget, and removing screenshots in batches instead of at every step. In a 144‑run study across four frontier models, GPT‑6.1 Sol completed all 18 test runs with correct answers, while other models often failed or hit step limits. The new policy also reduced cost from $1.97 to $0.47 per run, with 89 % of input coming from cache at just 5 % of the uncached price. Asana has shipped these changes to customers and plans to embed the testing framework into StackAI for ongoing cost‑runtime‑quality comparisons.
Model pages: GPT-6.1 Sol → · GPT-6 Astra →
Asana cuts model costs 76x in browser tests with GPT-6.1 Sol
OpenAI · 9 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by OpenAI. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Agents & Tools
All →- Open-source REA hits 100,000 GitHub stars as AI agents decompile software · 1 src
- AI Horizon compares ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini for coding use cases in 2026 · 1 src
- OpenAI Dots and Meta Muse compare on price, privacy, and limits · 1 src
- Game dev harnesses help LLMs handle non-code assets · 1 src
- Orca Security cuts cloud query costs by 90% with Amazon Bedrock agent · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions