DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Society & Work

ChatGPT Mac app flaw could have let hackers grab chat logs

Researchers at the Objective-See Foundation discovered a security vulnerability in the ChatGPT macOS application that could have allowed attackers to access sensitive user data. The flaw involved a trusted script interpreter that accepted untrusted scripts, enabling malicious code to bypass the app’s multi-layered digital signature checks. By spawning the interpreter three times, an attacker…

1 source

Key points

  • Objective-See researchers found a flaw in ChatGPT's Mac app allowing access to chat logs and browser sessions.
  • OpenAI acknowledged the bug and released a fix on September 25, citing a need to move faster on security.
  • Patrick Wardle noted the exploit was trivial, requiring only about a dozen lines of code to execute.

Patrick Wardle, a software analyst at Objective-See, described the exploit as "insanely trivial," noting that his proof of concept required only about a dozen lines of code. OpenAI acknowledged the issue and released a fix on September 25. A spokesperson, Shane Bauer, stated that the company recognizes the need to move faster on security practices. Wardle highlighted the broader risk posed by AI agents, which require deep system access to function, creating a significant attack surface if compromised.

Wardle plans to present this and other AI-related macOS security findings at the Objective by the Sea conference in November. He also recently identified a patched flaw in Meta’s Muse AI assistant and has submitted a new vulnerability report regarding OpenAI’s Dots AI assistant integration, which is currently under review. The incident underscores the tension between rapid feature development and robust security in AI platforms.

Read the original at Wired AI · by Lily Hay Newman, Matt BurgessOpen source ↗
Topics · follow one to build your own front page
OpenAIObjective-See FoundationMetaChatGPTMuse AIDots AIPatrick WardleShane Bauer

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Society & Work

All →

Related stories