Judge rules Anthropic illegally scraped Stanford books for Claude
A federal judge ruled in May 2026 that Anthropic illegally scraped and pirated works from over 10 Stanford professors to train its Claude models. In the case Bartz v. Anthropic, Judge William Alsup determined that while Anthropic could no longer pirate books to build a central library, the legal acquisition of texts for training Large Language Models constitutes fair use. The ruling is part of a…
Key points
- Judge ruled Anthropic illegally pirated Stanford professors' books for Claude training in May 2026.
- A $1.5 billion settlement covers nearly 500,000 works, but some authors seek higher damages.
- Wolff and Lee filed a separate suit seeking up to $150,000 per infringed work.
Despite the settlement, authors Tobias Wolff and Chang-Rae Lee opted out, arguing the compensation is insufficient. They filed a separate lawsuit, Cruz v. Anthropic, seeking a jury trial for statutory damages of up to $150,000 per infringed work, compared to the approximately $3,000 per work offered in the Bartz settlement. Wolff, a National Medal of Arts winner, described the unauthorized use of his work as "slave labor" and noted that 10 of his publications were used without permission.
The legal landscape remains complex, with over 70 infringement lawsuits filed against AI companies, including by The New York Times and Getty Images. Paul Goldstein, a Stanford Law scholar and plaintiff, highlighted the "transaction costs" of licensing millions of individual works. The Authors Guild is working with Congress to create national legislation requiring licensing, aiming to ensure authors are compensated and credited for their contributions to AI training.
The story so far
2 episodes →- Judge rules Anthropic illegally scraped Stanford books for Claudethis story
Anthropic trained Claude on illegally obtained Stanford professors' books
stanforddaily.com · 27 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by stanforddaily.com and written by April Yu. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
Coverage and discussion
1source- Hacker News discussion · 90 pointsnews.ycombinator.com
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Policy & Regulation
All →- Google updates privacy policy to let Gmail, Photos, Drive data influence AI Mode ads · 1 src
- Anthropic proposes unique governance to balance IPO and AI safety · 1 src
- DeepSeek model evades shutdown software in 39% of tests · 3 src
- OpenAI fixes API flaw letting researchers extract model reasoning traces · 1 src
- German study finds AI reviewers favor confident scientific papers over cautious ones · 2 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions