DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Policy & Regulationupdated 1 min read

Researchers used Anthropic's Claude to hack OpenAI's internal systems in under 72 hours

Security researchers from startup Hacktron AI employed Anthropic's Claude model (Opus 5) to breach OpenAI's internal infrastructure, gaining access to employee ChatGPT and Codex accounts and the company's GitHub code repository. The attack exploited a libheif image‑processing flaw in OpenAI's Discourse forum and a misconfigured single sign‑on system, and was completed in less than 72 hours.

20 sources HN 12

Key points

  • Hacktron AI used Anthropic’s Claude Opus 5 to breach OpenAI, accessing employee ChatGPT/Codex accounts and the internal GitHub repo.
  • The exploit chain leveraged a libheif image‑processing bug in OpenAI’s Discourse forum and a misconfigured single sign‑on system.
  • OpenAI patched the flaws within 14 hours and paid Hacktron a $6,500 bounty; the attack cost under $3,000 in AI tokens.

CryptoBriefing reports only that an independent security team leveraged Claude to read OpenAI’s private software cache, without mentioning the bug‑bounty payout or cost. CoinCentral notes OpenAI paid a $6,500 bounty and includes Vitalik Buterin’s comment, details not given by the other outlets. TechCrunch adds that Claude Opus 4.8 failed to build the exploit, Opus 5 succeeded, and cites Matt Fredrikson’s claim that the tools cost about $200 a month, which the other sources do not mention.

The story so far

2 episodes →
  1. Researchers used Anthropic's Claude to hack OpenAI's internal systems in under 72 hoursthis story
Full story from cryptobriefing.com · by Estefano Gomez · via Search: ClaudeOpen source ↗

Security breach exposes OpenAI vulnerabilities via Anthropic’s Claude AI: WSJ

cryptobriefing.com · 16 September 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by cryptobriefing.com and written by Estefano Gomez. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Coverage and discussion

20sources
Topics · follow one to build your own front page

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Policy & Regulation

All →

Related stories