DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research

Researchers introduce RegretBench and BackUpper for coding agents

Researchers from arXiv have introduced RegretBench, a benchmark designed to test the "backup awareness" of autonomous coding agents. The benchmark consists of 205 executable tasks derived from real-world regret moments reported on platforms like X.com, GitHub, and Stack Overflow, where users explicitly stated they needed state they had failed to preserve. The study evaluates six frontier models,…

1 source primary source

Key points

  • RegretBench contains 205 tasks based on real user regrets about lost state.
  • Frontier agents complete 86.1% of tasks but back up state in only 15.2% of cases.
  • BackUpper restores state with 92.2% similarity at a cost of $0.014 per task.

To address this limitation, the authors propose BackUpper, a harness plug-in that acts as a backup layer. It intercepts every tool call to preserve affected state before modification, using rule-based strategies for common operations and a lightweight subagent for complex scenarios. On the RegretBench, BackUpper covers every regret moment action and restores states with 92.2% average similarity to the original. The system achieves this at a cost of $0.014 per task, using 7x fewer tokens than a main-agent self-backup baseline. Additionally, when user preferences are provided, BackUpper matches human annotations on preservation worthiness with an 84.5% F1 score, suggesting agents can maintain reversibility at low cost.

Read the original at arXiv cs.AI · by Xu Li, Simon Yu, Minzhou Pan, Yiyou Sun, Zhaorun Chen, Bo Li, Weiyan Shi primary sourceOpen source ↗

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories