DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research

Researchers propose surrogate log-probabilities to audit LLM agents

A new arXiv paper introduces a method to audit black-box LLM agents by using a low-cost, open-weight surrogate model. The approach addresses the problem that frontier chat APIs hide token probabilities, making it difficult to detect silent errors in tool calls or code before they execute. The surrogate runs in parallel, reading the same context and proposed action as the main agent, and scores…

3 sources primary source

Key points

  • Method uses open-weight surrogate log-probabilities to audit black-box LLM agents without accessing internals.
  • Achieved AUROC 0.825 on coding tasks, outperforming actor confidence (0.598) by +0.07 to +0.28.
  • Real-time gating and confidence feedback improved task success on live-execution benchmarks.

The method uses complementary readouts, including teacher forcing, request-PMI, and discriminative verdicts, to identify wrong argument values or holistically incorrect calls. It is training-free and requires no access to the agent's internals, costing only one prefill pass. On difficult coding tasks, the method achieved an AUROC of 0.825, significantly outperforming the actor's stated confidence, which was near chance at 0.598.

The paper demonstrates two deployment modes: a real-time gate that escalates low-confidence calls for review, and confidence feedback that allows the agent to adapt. These modes improved accepted-action accuracy and task success on live-execution benchmarks, with statistical significance reported at p <= 1e-4.

Read the original at arXiv cs.AI · by Yikai Zhao, Saurabh Pandey, Pradeep Kumar Misra primary sourceOpen source ↗

Coverage and discussion

3sources

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories