arXiv study finds parameter schemas shift LLM tool selection before calls
A new arXiv paper examines how metadata influences LLM tool selection in Model Context Protocol (MCP) systems. Researchers analyzed 367,174 tools and found that functionally similar tools often differ in their parameter schemas despite sharing names and descriptions. Through controlled experiments across five LLMs and five tasks, they isolated the impact of metadata factors like server names,…
Key points
- Parameter schemas cause the biggest and most consistent shifts in LLM tool selection, per arXiv study
- Descriptions explaining parameters boost selection, while tool names have weaker effects
- Schema design and ordering influence which tool is chosen before any API call occurs
The study reveals that parameter-schema variations produce the largest and most consistent shifts in tool selection. LLMs tend to favor tools with separate top-level parameters over grouped or composite forms. Descriptions that explain parameters also increase selection likelihood, while name effects are weaker. The findings suggest schema design and tool ordering can determine which implementation is invoked—even when functionality remains identical—before any API call is made.
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Generative AI & Models
All →- Claude bests ChatGPT, Gemini in Kyoto-style meeting declines · 1 src
- Meta introduces Muse Wonder and Muse Wonder Full frontier models for agents · 19 src
- Hugging Face highlights 10 models for 2026 adoption and benchmarks · 1 src
- Meshy introduces Ultra 4K for 3D models with 80M triangles · 1 src
- GPT-4o invents answers, Claude keeps answering b · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions