Data centers adopt PFAS cooling chemicals as AI demand rises, ChemSec estimates
A ChemSec report says AI‑driven data‑center expansion is prompting major PFAS producers to boost output. Japanese conglomerate Daikin, French materials maker Arkema and U.S. chemical firm Chemours are scaling PFAS capacity for cooling systems, semiconductor manufacturing and lithium‑ion battery material production. New cooling designs replace water with fluorinated PFAS fluids.
Key points
- Data center cooling is shifting from water to PFAS fluorinated chemicals, driven by AI infrastructure demand.
- ChemSec reports PFAS producers earned about $4 billion profit in 2022, while societal costs are estimated at $17.5 trillion annually.
- BOMA study says data centers made up nearly 46 % of private construction last year, up from under 5 % a decade ago.
ChemSec notes the world’s biggest PFAS makers earned roughly $4 billion profit in 2022, while an earlier 2023 analysis estimated $17.5 trillion a year in societal costs such as healthcare, cleanup and contaminated water. A 2026 BOMA study found data‑center facilities accounted for nearly 46 % of private construction last year, up from less than 5 % a decade ago, and Statista reports spending rose from $1.8 billion in 2014 to $41.1 billion last year. Chemours derives between half and two‑thirds of its $5.8 billion revenue from PFAS and is developing new refrigerants like Opteon 2P50, despite a July letter from 17 environmental groups urging the EPA to reject the fast‑track request.
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data show PFAS in the blood of 97 % of Americans. French citizens sued Arkema and Daikin in January, and Daikin says it has accelerated investments since 2022 to better control emissions. Chemours claims its cooling system operates as a closed loop with minimal gas loss.
The story so far
2 episodes →- Data centers adopt PFAS cooling chemicals as AI demand rises, ChemSec estimatesthis story
Data centers are swapping water for forever chemicals to keep AI cool
fortune.com · 18 September 2026
The midterms are six weeks away and Republicans are walking a fine line between meeting constituents in opposition to data center growth and agreeing with the president who continues to advocate for them. Now there seems to be another wrinkle to the ongoing data center backlash: the release of “forever chemicals” into the air.
A new report from chemical watchdog ChemSec found that most of the world’s biggest PFAS producers are expanding their capacity thanks to AI infrastructure. PFAS, also known as “forever chemicals,” are being used to handle the enormous amounts of heat generated from data center equipment. The report found that major chemical producers—including Japanese conglomerate Daikin, French materials manufacturing company Arkema and American chemical company Chemours—are increasing PFAS production thanks to growing demand from semiconductor and data center industries. This stems from three main demand sources: data center cooling, semiconductor manufacturing and lithium-ion battery materials.
It seems to be a catch-22 from a noted criticism of data centers: water usage. Newer cooling systems in these facilities are using fluorinated chemicals that include PFAS instead of water. The world’s biggest makers of “forever chemicals” pulled in roughly $4 billion in profit in 2022, against an estimated $17.5 trillion a year in societal costs—healthcare, cleanup, contaminated water—according to an earlier 2023 analysis by ChemSec.
Thanks to the AI boom spurring data center development, the need to mitigate the effects of heat stemming from equipment may also drive up that demand for PFAS. This, while data center development continues growing: a 2026 study from the commercial real estate trade association BOMA found data center facilities accounted for nearly 46% of private construction last year, compared to less than 5% a decade ago. The actual dollar value of data construction spending exploded as well: from $1.8 billion in 2014 to $41.1 billion last year, per Statista.
The materials needed in the AI race
“Forever chemicals” are highly resistant to heat. That makes the chemical-bonded substances particularly useful in many common consumer products such as food packaging, stain-resistant sprays and firefighting foam. Due to the strong chemical bond of PFAS, it doesn’t degrade easily—making it dangerous for both humans and nature when exposed. That makeup also makes PFAS desirable in semiconductor manufacturing, industrial equipment and cooling systems, but that durability is also what makes their environmental, and health, footprint hard to cover.
In fact, that chemical durability is showing up in our lives. Data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey found PFAS in the blood of 97% of Americans.
According to the ChemSec report, Chemours produces or uses more PFAS substances than any other on ChemSec’s list, per ChemSec’s SIN Producers database. The study also found the company is developing products intended for data center cooling as it expands its production of PFAS refrigerants. ChemSec estimates between half and two-thirds of Chemours’ $5.8 billion revenue comes from PFAS production. Daikin also plans to triple its PFAS capacity in response to semiconductor demand, according to the report, just as Arkema begins expanding production in North America and in Asia.
Data center cooling has already become a battleground. In July, 17 environmental organizations submitted a letter to the EPA to reject Chemours’ application to fast-track a new PFAS chemical—Opteon 2P50—for use in data center cooling. The groups argued that Chemours had underestimated the compound’s potential health and climate risks, and that the available toxicological evidence was insufficient.
“A hyperscale data center can contain hundreds of tanks, totaling tens of thousands of liters of dielectric fluid,” the letter read. “If even a small fraction of the Opteon 2P50 used in a large data center leaks, it would result in a significant release of PFAS gases. And when cooling tanks need to be replaced, large amounts of Opteon 2P50 will be disposed or released, increasing the risk to the public and the environment.”
Chemours has denied these concerns according to a report from The Guardian. The company said the system operates as a “closed loop” and the amount of gas escaping during operation is low. The chemical corporation has also continued moving forward in its data center cooling process, launching new refrigerants in August.
“AI is reshaping the demands placed on cooling infrastructure, and customers need solutions that can keep pace without compromising efficiency, reliability, or long-term regulatory readiness,” Joseph Martinko, President of Thermal & Specialized Solutions at Chemours, said in a press release. “Chemours is expanding the choices available to chiller OEMs and operators as they build and maintain the critical systems powering data centers, commercial buildings, and other mission critical environments, while further strengthening our position in attractive, high-growth cooling applications.”
Chemours did not immediately respond to a request for comment from Fortune.
French citizens have also filed a lawsuit against Arkema and Daikin on PFAS pollution allegations in January as well, citing concerns of “chemical valley.” The lawsuit included 192 citizens and four environmental organizations.
Arkema stated it “will defend itself before the court against the allegations contained in the summons,” and has separately pushed back on related contamination claims. Daikin said it has “accelerated its investments” since 2022 to better control its PFAS emissions.
breaks the traditional barrier between audience and newsroom. The show transforms
Fortune Daily Fortune’s trusted reporting into actionable, conversational, and entertaining insights for an emerging class of business leaders.
This text was published by fortune.com and written by Joshua Hong. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us.
More in Policy & Regulation
All →- Anthropic reports three metrics to monitor AI development speed · 6 src
- Microsoft AI chief says OpenAI safety incident is a serious situation · 1 src
- Cloudflare launches Disallow AI Training to separate search indexing from model data use · 3 src
- Security breach reportedly exposes OpenAI vulnerabilities via Anthropic's Claude AI · 14 src
- Opinion: AI governance plans must include night‑shift coverage, says Unite.AI · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions