Epic and Microsoft issue DMCA takedowns against AI game clones while using AI internally
Epic Games and Microsoft sent DMCA takedown notices to browser-based recreations of their games, including Fortnite, Minecraft, Call of Duty, and Halo, according to a report by Kotaku on October 26, 2026. The actions target AI-assisted reproductions of smaller studio titles like Slay the Spire 2, Celeste, and RimWorld, though the exact number of notices and their status remain unverified. Both…
Key points
- Epic and Microsoft issued DMCA takedowns against AI-generated browser recreations of their games, including Fortnite, Minecraft, and Call of Duty
- Smaller studios like *Slay the Spire 2* and *Celeste* are also affected by AI-assisted unauthorized reproductions, per Kotaku’s report
- Tim Sweeney clarified Epic’s stance: AI training on Unreal Engine outputs is restricted but may be revised, and fair use remains fact-specific
Tim Sweeney, Epic’s founder, clarified the company’s position in an October 27 X post. He emphasized that Epic prohibits unauthorized use of its intellectual property without permission or compensation. Sweeney also noted that while Epic’s current End User License Agreement (EULA) restricts AI training on Unreal Engine outputs and MetaHuman, the company is working to remove those restrictions. He disputed the idea that all AI training inherently constitutes theft, citing the Bartz v. Anthropic ruling, which distinguished between transformative fair use (e.g., training on copyrighted books) and unauthorized piracy. The ruling did not create a universal safe harbor for AI training, and the law remains fact-specific. Meanwhile, the enforcement gap disproportionately affects indie developers, who lack the resources to challenge takedowns or navigate legal hurdles. The industry now faces the question of whether companies leveraging AI for competitive advantage will apply the same rigorous standards to their own pipelines.
Epic and Microsoft Target AI Game Clones While Using AI
gadgetreview.com · 27 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by gadgetreview.com and written by Al Landes. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Policy & Regulation
All →- Anthropic warns AI safety remains unsolved in annual report · 5 src
- Google says UK regulator’s AI choice plan may violate its own rules · 1 src
- Eight states sue OpenAI over ChatGPT safety failures for teens · 2 src
- Google updates privacy policy to let Gmail, Photos, Drive data influence AI Mode ads · 1 src
- Anthropic proposes unique governance to balance IPO and AI safety · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions