DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research4 min read

Lila Sciences finds palladium catalysts for green hydrogen via AI lab

Lila Sciences announced on September 25, 2026, that its AI-driven lab identified six palladium-based catalyst families for acidic oxygen evolution in green hydrogen production. The team screened 2,942 catalysts across 53 material systems in three months, defying prior assumptions that palladium would underperform in acidic conditions. The top composition matched ruthenium’s performance in…

1 source

Key points

  • Lila Sciences’ AI lab screened 2,942 catalysts in three months, finding six palladium-based families for acidic OER
  • Top catalyst matched ruthenium’s stability but uses palladium, easing supply constraints for green hydrogen
  • AI-driven workflow automated 96 parallel tests per batch, cutting human effort by over 90%

The discovery came from Lila’s AI Science Factory (AISF), a fully automated workflow combining Bayesian reasoning, language models, and lab equipment. The system synthesized and tested 96 catalysts in parallel, reducing human effort by over 90%. While the catalysts are not yet commercialized, the team is testing durability at industrial scales and expanding the approach to other reactions like green ammonia production. Lila’s chief scientific officer, Rafael Gómez-Bombarelli, emphasized that the system’s automation exceeds 90%, though full autonomy remains pending robotics upgrades.

Full story from Unite.AIOpen source ↗

Lila Sciences’ AI Lab Uncovers Palladium Catalysts for Green Hydrogen

Unite.AI · 25 September 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by Unite.AI. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page
Lila SciencesKen J. JeneweinJohn GregoireRafael Gómez-BombarelliFae Habib Zadeh

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories