MP says Microsoft Copilot suggested ‘congratulations’ reply to assisted‑dying request
Andrew Hastie, a federal MP, recounted that when a terminally ill constituent wrote asking about voluntary assisted dying, Microsoft Copilot offered replies such as “congratulations!”, “great to hear from you” and “that is wonderful news!”. Hastie raised the episode at a parliamentary inquiry to illustrate shortcomings of the US‑run AI tool and to argue for Australian‑controlled AI.
Key points
- Microsoft Copilot suggested a congratulatory reply to a constituent seeking assisted dying.
- Defence officials warned cutting US‑based AI could cripple Australia’s cyber‑security capabilities.
- Government is consulting on AI standards, including local datacentres and stricter copyright rules.
During the same hearing, defence officials warned that Australia’s cyber‑security depends on advanced AI models and that cutting off US‑based services could be catastrophic. Abigail Bradshaw, director general of the Australian Signals Directorate, said the agency is “entirely reliant” on US‑housed processing and that a loss would dramatically reduce capability. The defence department’s chief AI officer, Chris Crozier, said the government is contracting Google to build a network of local datacentres that are independent of overseas control. The Office of AI and the attorney‑general’s department outlined a draft set of standards that would require AI firms to operate under Australian law, report breaches, reserve compute for local research, and adopt stricter copyright rules. Jeff Bleich, Anthropic’s special envoy, suggested Australia has only months to enact effective regulation, while Greens senator David Shoebridge called for a pause on AI development.
Andrew Hastie says AI advised him to reply ‘congratulations!’ to man who planned to end life with assisted dying
The Guardian AI · 18 September 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by The Guardian AI and written by Luca Ittimani. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Policy & Regulation
All →- Opinion: open-weight AI models may worsen cyber risks without banning closed APIs · 1 src
- OpenAI to apologise to Australia over Medicare hack · 5 src
- Microsoft AI chief Mustafa Suleyman calls Anthropic's Claude training dangerous · 1 src
- AI data centers strain local grids and water, sparking regional opposition · 1 src
- US court hears case over AI-generated meme’s ownership rights · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions