DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research7 min read

OpenAI claims AI-generated proof of quasi‑Riemann hypothesis

OpenAI released a batch of 377 papers on October 6, 2026, among which a 199‑page manuscript claims to prove that all nontrivial zeros of the Riemann zeta function lie between 1/8 and 7/8. A second, shorter 49‑page version, dated about a week later, asserts a weaker bound of 1/12 to 11/12 and is the only paper in the set that received human editing.

1 source HN 42

Key points

  • OpenAI posted 377 papers on Oct 6 2026, including a 199‑page proof placing zeros between 1/8 and 7/8.
  • A 49‑page version proves zeros lie between 1/12 and 11/12 and is the only paper edited by a human.
  • Top mathematicians deem the result likely correct but note it does not resolve the full Riemann hypothesis.

Mathematicians such as Jared Duker Lichtman (Stanford), Maksym Radziwiłł (NYU) and Alexander Dunn (Georgia Tech) describe the result as the most significant AI‑for‑math achievement to date, noting that it synthesizes existing ideas without introducing new concepts. Leading number theorists, including Peter Sarnak (Princeton) and Michael Rubinstein (Waterloo), say the proof appears correct but await full verification, and they stress that it does not settle the full Riemann hypothesis, which remains an open problem after 160 years.

The story so far

9 episodes →
  1. OpenAI claims AI-generated proof of quasi‑Riemann hypothesisthis story
Full story from quantamagazine.org · via Hacker NewsOpen source ↗

AI Proved the Quasi-Riemann Hypothesis. What Happens Now?

quantamagazine.org · 19 October 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by quantamagazine.org. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Coverage and discussion

1source
Topics · follow one to build your own front page
OpenAIJared Duker LichtmanMaksym RadziwiłłAlexander DunnPeter SarnakMichael RubinsteinHenryk Iwaniec

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories