DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Generative AI & Modelsupdated 4 min read

Pangram launches AI image and video detectors with 99.96% accuracy

The flagship model, Pangram Image 1.0, achieves 99.96% accuracy on a test set of 1,200 synthetic images created by 12 frontier AI generators. It includes a heatmap feature to pinpoint AI content within images and claims robustness against edits, compression, and low resolutions (now supporting 256x256 pixels with reduced confidence disclaimers below 512x512). The smaller Flash 1.0 model excels…

2 sources HN 5

Key points

  • Pangram Image 1.0 achieves **99.96% accuracy** detecting AI-generated images in a test of 1,200 synthetic images
  • Flash 1.0 scores **98.7% on DF26**, a **29-point improvement** over existing video detectors
  • Both models now include **Chrome extensions** and **API support**, plus native video upload for frame-by-frame analysis

The company tested its tools against academic benchmarks like X-AIGD, Mirage-Test, and AIGVDBench, comparing performance against commercial and open-source detectors. Pangram’s models also support native video uploads for frame-by-frame analysis. The release follows a research preview earlier this year, with improvements driven by community feedback. Isaac, a research engineer at Pangram (formerly Samsung AI Center NYC), led the development.

Full story from pangram.com · by Isaac Kasahara · via TechmemeOpen source ↗

Pangram releases Pangram Image 1.0, which it says is state-of-the-art in AI image and AI video detection, and the smaller Image Flash 1.0 for AI video detection

pangram.com · 4 November 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by pangram.com and written by Isaac Kasahara. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Coverage and discussion

2sources
Topics · follow one to build your own front page
PangramPangram Image 1.0Pangram Image Flash 1.0Isaac

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Generative AI & Models

All →

Related stories