Women may face higher AI job loss risk, history of switch operators and PCs suggests
Ariane Hegewisch, senior research fellow at the Institute for Women’s Policy Research, says AI is focused on routine, clerical tasks that are still 90% performed by women. The International Labour Organization reported in March that nearly one in ten women in high‑income countries work in occupations at the highest AI risk.
Key points
- ILO says nearly 1 in 10 women in high‑income countries hold jobs at highest AI risk.
- AT&T’s automated switch removed about 75,000 female operator jobs in the 1940s‑50s.
- In 1980, 4.7 million U.S. secretaries, stenographers and typists were 98% women.
Historical parallels are drawn to the automated telephone switch introduced by AT&T in the 1940s‑50s, which eliminated an estimated 75,000 operator jobs—about 95% of whom were women. Economists James Feigenbaum (Boston University) and Daniel P. Gross (Duke) documented the shock, noting many displaced workers took lower‑pay jobs or left the labor force. Later, the personal computer era displaced millions of female secretaries; the 1980 census listed 4.7 million such workers, 98% women. Yet women adapted, moving into service, retail, and managerial roles, helping the female labor‑force participation rise from 34% to 52% between 1950 and 1980.
A 2022 study by Marcus Dillender and Eliza Forsythe found software automation cut sector employment by 1% but raised college‑graduate wages by 3%, suggesting AI could reshape but not wholly erase women’s work.
Women may be at greater risk of AI job losses. Telephone switch operators and PCs show why.
CNBC Technology · 19 October 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by CNBC Technology and written by Steve Liesman. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Society & Work
All →- Opinion: AI systems are not conscious and unlikely to become so · 1 src
- Google opens SynthID Detector to public ahead of Nigeria’s 2027 elections · 3 src
- Meta says Claude AI tool triggered mistaken suspension of No Kings Coalition Instagram account · 3 src
- Google backs Bangalore Climate Data Week AI demos for farmers and rooftop solar · 1 src
- AI capability gap could narrow as open source models improve, analysts say · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions