DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Research

ArXiv introduces realcli benchmark to evaluate human‑agent collaboration for CLI agents

A new arXiv paper presents REALCLI, a paired benchmark designed to assess both task execution and the quality of human‑agent collaboration on realistic command‑line interface (CLI) tasks. The framework defines five dimensions, broken down into 22 sub‑dimensions and 51 interaction scenario templates, allowing systematic measurement of how agents work with users.

1 source primary source

Key points

  • REALCLI benchmark evaluates both task execution and human‑agent collaboration on CLI tasks.
  • Two modes: REALCLI‑EXEC (full specs up front) and REALCLI‑COLLAB (progressive user input).
  • Top frontier agent scores 49.2% overall and 37.6% joint collaboration, showing major capability gaps.

REALCLI offers two evaluation modes. REALCLI‑EXEC supplies the full task specification at the start, while REALCLI‑COLLAB uses a scripted user that provides information, corrections, constraint changes, and authorization decisions progressively during execution. When frontier CLI agents were tested, the best configuration achieved an average overall score of only 49.2%, and a joint collaboration score of just 37.6%, revealing a sharp gap between task effectiveness and collaborative performance. The authors argue that current agents struggle with steerability, trust calibration, and safety boundary management, and they position REALCLI as a reproducible foundation for advancing collaborative CLI agents.

The benchmark aims to give researchers a concrete tool for measuring and improving interactive capabilities, which are increasingly critical as CLI agents take on longer‑horizon, user‑driven tasks.

Read the original at arXiv cs.CL · by Yunqi Liu, Peiyu Wang, Bingli Wang, Leo Luo, Xuanwu Song, Xudong Ma, Hongxin Li, Yaxin Du, Weicheng Gu, Fanglin Xu, Yi Xing, XiangLong Liu, Jujie He, Zhange Zhang, Huatong Song, Zhaoyi Li, Deyang Kong, Chuan Hao, Peihao Wu, Mingjie Tang, Ran Tao, Jian Yang, Wayne Xin Zhao, Bryan Dai primary sourceOpen source ↗

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Research

All →

Related stories