DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Agents & Tools4 min read

Delinea tests Anthropic Claude Mythos 5.1 on its own privileged‑access code

Delinea, an identity‑security company, has joined Anthropic’s Project Glasswing to run the Claude Mythos 5.1 model against parts of its own software that store, broker, and rotate privileged credentials. The experiment turns the frontier AI model inward, letting it scan vaulting logic, secret storage, rotation mechanisms, key management, session‑brokering code, and policy‑enforcement paths for…

1 source

Key points

  • Delinea joined Anthropic’s Project Glasswing to test Claude Mythos 5.1 on its own identity‑security code.
  • Mythos will examine vaulting, secret rotation, key management, session brokering, and policy enforcement logic.
  • Delinea treats the model as a privileged identity with scoped, temporary, logged access in an isolated environment.

CEO Art Gilliland said the goal is to use the best tools available to attack the company’s own assumptions and find problems before attackers do. Chief Information Security Officer Pierre Mouallem explained that Mythos is treated like any other privileged identity: its access is scoped, temporary, logged, and runs in an isolated environment with no customer data. Findings will feed into Delinea’s existing security process and be incorporated into secure‑coding standards, pre‑merge checks, and test coverage, aiming to reduce recurring weaknesses in future releases.

Full story from dqindia.com · by Manisha Sharma · via Search: AnthropicOpen source ↗

Delinea tests Anthropic AI against its own security code

dqindia.com · 22 September 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by dqindia.com and written by Manisha Sharma. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page
DelineaAnthropicClaude Mythos 5.1Art GillilandPierre Mouallem

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Agents & Tools

All →

Related stories