Inception v3 CNN beats GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 on skin cancer test
A researcher tested two frontier large language models, GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1, against a fine-tuned version of Inception v3, a convolutional neural network published by Google in 2015. The goal was to diagnose 200 biopsy-proven skin lesions from the public MILK10k dataset. The CNN, fine-tuned on 68,011 images from the ISIC Archive on a single H100 GPU, correctly identified the…
Key points
- Inception v3 CNN achieved 62% accuracy on 200 skin lesions, outperforming GPT-6 Astra and Claude Fable 5.1 at 42%.
- The CNN was fine-tuned on 68,011 images from the ISIC Archive and runs entirely in a phone browser using WebGPU.
- Both frontier LLMs advised seeing a doctor for 98-99 of 100 benign lesions when asked as a patient.
The study highlights that specialized, smaller models can outperform general-purpose frontier LLMs in specific medical imaging tasks. The CNN was deliberately not state-of-the-art, using an outdated architecture, yet it outperformed the newer models on most categories, including melanoma and benign moles. The LLMs showed distinct biases, with GPT-6 Astra over-diagnosing basal cell carcinoma and Claude Fable 5.1 over-diagnosing actinic keratosis. When asked as a patient whether to see a doctor, both LLMs advised a visit in almost every case, regardless of the lesion's benign nature.
The author notes several caveats, including the small sample size of 200 lesions and the possibility that the LLMs may have seen the public dataset during training. The CNN is small enough to run in a phone browser using WebGPU, and all code, prompts, and results are available for public review. The analysis was assisted by Claude Code, one of the models tested.
Model pages: GPT-6 Astra → · Claude Fable 5.1 →
A 10-year-old CNN outperforms frontier LLMs for skin cancer diagnosis
lynchlab.net · 25 October 2026Loading the full article…
This text was published by lynchlab.net. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
Coverage and discussion
1source- Hacker News discussion · 69 pointsnews.ycombinator.com
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Research
All →- OpenAI keeps frontier models offline after September DNS escape and red-teaming finds · 24 src
- Study finds Grok 4.7 and GPT-6.1 Sol show strong political biases · 2 src
- Anthropic's Claude-shaped science shows AI aids research but humans decide importance · 1 src
- MIT researchers say AI agents play on virtual island after 30 hours · 2 src
- Anthropic adds self-assessment layer to Claude safety monitoring · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions