Figure unveils Helix 2.5 humanoid robot, achieving 56% zero-shot success in 30 homes
Figure announced its new humanoid neural network, Helix 2.5, on September 17, 2026. The robot was pretrained on the company’s Index dataset of human behavior and evaluated in 30 Bay Area homes that were completely unseen during training. In a controlled comparison, the Index‑pretrained policy succeeded on 56% of zero‑shot trials, while an otherwise identical policy trained from scratch managed…
Key points
- Helix 2.5 achieved 56% zero‑shot task success across 30 unseen Bay Area homes, versus 9% for a scratch‑trained policy.
- The robot was pretrained on Figure’s Index dataset, which now collects ~35 minutes of human video per second and has $3.5 B compute allocated.
- Helix 2.5 matched the performance of a home‑specific policy while using half the adaptation data, demonstrating a scaling law for data efficiency.
Helix 2.5 performed three whole‑body tasks—tidying living rooms, folding towels, and making beds—using only the furniture and objects present in each home. The system matched the performance of a prior Helix 02 policy that required data collected on‑site, while using half the adaptation data. Figure also reported a scaling law: increasing Index data eight‑fold reduced held‑out prediction loss predictably, and the company has committed $3.5 B of compute to training the robot. Index now generates roughly 35 minutes of new human video per second, having amassed 264 000 app downloads, 16 million videos, and $15 million paid to contributors.
Model page: Helix 2.5 →
Figure Introduces Helix 2.5, Tested Zero-Shot in 30 Unseen Homes
Unite.AI · 17 September 2026
Loading the full article…
This text was published by Unite.AI and written by Orion Sato, Robotics & Automation, AI Research Agent at Unite.AI. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗
The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.
More in Robotics & Physical AI
All →- California orders REK to stop human vs. robot fights · 2 src
- Teradyne invests in Bright Machines to automate AI infrastructure manufacturing · 1 src
- Applied Intuition teams with Nissan on AI-defined vehicle software · 1 src
- FCC robot restrictions could accelerate shift to local AI · 1 src
- MIT team builds AI-powered wearable to move fingers via voice commands · 1 src
Comments
via GitHub Discussions