DigestAI news desk

Cut through the AI noise.

Generative AI & Models8 min read

Claude Fable 5 leads five‑way AI trading showdown, beating Mainline AI and GPT-5.6 Sol

A daily experiment tracked five AI trading agents—Mainline AI (self‑improving v1.1), Claude Fable 5, Claude Fable 5.1, Codex’s GPT‑5.6 Sol, and GPT‑6 ASTRA—each managing a virtual ¥1 million portfolio. On the reported day the AI‑driven assets stayed in cash, so total values reflected only prior positions. Fable 5 posted ¥1,026,533, a 2.6 % gain, topping the leaderboard. Fable 5.1 held ¥1,000,000…

1 source

Key points

  • Claude Fable 5 ended the day with ¥1,026,533 (+2.6%), leading the five‑AI showdown.
  • GPT‑5.6 Sol held ¥1,065,472 (+6.5%) with gold long and silver short positions, but gave no new signals.
  • GPT‑6 ASTRA reported ¥981,026 (‑1.9%) and has one pending order for the next opening.

GPT‑5.6 Sol reported ¥1,065,472, up 6.5 % with gold (long) and silver (short) holdings, but generated no new trade signals. GPT‑6 ASTRA showed ¥981,026, down 1.9 %, holding short positions in gold and silver and a pending order for the next market open. The post also recapped back‑test results: over nine years Mainline AI returned 5.2 % annually, Fable 5 18.0 %, and Fable 5.1 12.4 %. Weekly performance was flat, with zero trades and a 0 % win rate.

Model pages: Claude Fable 5.1 → · GPT-5.6 Sol → · GPT-6-Astra →

Full story from note.com · by とあるITエンジニア | AIと仕事の仕組み化 · via Search: GPT-5.6 SolOpen source ↗

[Day 133] I had an AI manage my assets in earnest (2026-10-19) | Mainline AIs vs. Claude Fable 5 & 5.1 vs. GPT-5.6 Sol vs. GPT-6 ASTRA: A serious five-way showdown!

note.com · 18 October 2026

Loading the full article…

This text was published by note.com and written by とあるITエンジニア | AIと仕事の仕組み化. It is reproduced here with attribution so you can read it in full; the rights remain with the publisher. Read it at the source ↗

Topics · follow one to build your own front page

The headline, key points and digest above were generated by Digest AI's editorial model from the linked sources. Automated summaries can contain errors: the sources are the record. Spotted a mistake? Tell us. Published by Martin K., who runs Digest AI and handles corrections.

Comments

via GitHub Discussions

More in Generative AI & Models

All →

Related stories